Exerts of a SciCVN's Chapter 7, Dialogs of DynEq and Equanimity; of Inner/Outer Peace-building:'Templates'; (as are the other page excerpts).<Update revision: Jan 2018>. <some compositions are Older Versions now having extensive revision> Two documents below outline a 'Science of Consciousness' and a mindfulness movement, as concertedly defined over many decades of contributed ISP research.
Intro to bio on Dr. Wallace, including founding projects and principled accomplishments of consciousness studies: Two updated documents below are longitudinal outlines of ISP research progress. Previous obsolete versions of present editing have been on Wikipedia since Sept. 2015 (B. Alan Wallace's Talk page). A part of these essays document the above President's Wikipedia bio. SciCVN.org supports cordial effort to dialogue with the various editors concerned, as voiced concerns to the WikiMedia board of management. The outlines are most suited to this chapter, because of their representations of contiguous dialogue and debate.
INDEX (1) Outlines of the International Shamatha Project (ISP): in dialogue, research and praxis, as foundations of science contributed by SBInstitute for Consciousness Studies. (2) A nominated Wiki-presentation on a Science of Consciousness.
(1)Outlines of the International Shamatha Project (ISP): in dialogue, research and Praxis, as pioneered by science master, Dr Alan Wallace. This contains an Intro to SciCVN synopses of research forwarded for reformulating the ISP President's bio on Wikipedia (incl. founding projects and accomplishments), presented as discussion guidelines. Two updated documents below are longitudinal outlines of ISP research progress. Previous versions of present editing have been on-site since Sept. 2015 (B. Alan Wallace's 'Talk' page). Salient parts of essays comprise components of a bio. SciCVN.org welcomes dialogue with various editors concerned, as extensively voiced concerns to the WikiMedia board of management. The topics are suitable material for this chapter among records of contiguous dialogue and debate. <765SA WikiRecords543UpdateFeb2018>The ISP project signifies half a century of larger research endeavour, comprehending a pragmatic progression of science hypotheses. In this, its President has sufficiently engaged in both educated and uneducated questions arising in manifold dialogue, and on Dr Wallace's Wiki page (of which the ISP initiative is integrative), there has been a long-remaining mention of several aspects of cynicism in a forum of belittling remarks. To these, lots of pity and kindness needed to be shown. When the SciCVN refutations appeared, the whole bio-version was scrapped, only to start again on a renewed shenanigan. There previously was a special heading of the bio page under the name of Criticisms (which is what they are not), and since SciCVN interventions of Sept. 2015 that was scrapped, but then further features of unwarranted text continued into 2016. The remarks are sourced to a promotional link of non-Wikipedia prejudiced reflections of an abusive website, where ISP mainstream contemplative-neuroscience had not been of the slightest mention to accompany what is not, as alleged, debate or dialogue with Wallace beside a singular posed assumption. References hinge on a telephone discussion from a podcast panel for which first premises of argumentation were refuted. That confusion arose from lacks of understanding the natural-language NL dialectics as qualified science: outlines of simplicity pertaining to research into central foundations of science, philosophy, and culture (Wallace's structured knowledge requisite to comprehend the foundations of quantum physics since 1900). From the outset these have been verified as scientific working hypotheses (not philosophical notions), by way of theory and practice as part of special and general theories of ontological relativity 'S/Gtor' (Wallace 2007).  Serious causes affected by the errors were also described in detail on the bio's 'Talk' page.
A nominated Wikipedia entry on a 'Science of Consciousness' was further presented on Dr Wallace's Wiki 'Talk' page, as an original brainchild of his initiative (updated on SciCVN). These kind of relevant facts are referents of investigation for such a bio, and foreground contexts of that dialog. All the contrary discussions including those of a Stanford internet team member, were displaced files to not be immediately visible (Sept 2015). The report and its updates were thereafter placed on the SciCVN.org website, and extensive reasonings were updated that contradicted the non-criticisms. Amicable ways forward were clearly posited. The Santa Barbara Institute for Consciousness Studies and a consensus of international scholarship have consistently raised standards from the outset, of being optimally critical (not hyper-critical) on analyses pertaining to scientism and illusions of knowledge: as part of reflecting on varied prejudice with equanimity and a definitive profundity of practicable wisdom. Worthy mention is of a meaningful functionality of Jimmy Wale's original intentions as Wikipedia CEO, on founding aspirations for a Wikipedia in different form called Nupedia: an online encyclopaedia-version relying on expert contribution.With respect to pre-ISP intercollegiate research since the 70's, qualms have clearly with merit been demystified, allaying conflicts and engendering equanimity beyond extranuous philosophical bickering: that pertaining to authentic nurture of flourishing by culture and by counterpart of qualified science. The above applies to qualms at prior phases of ISP science endeavour. Through that syntheses of studies, a pragmatic methodology has been sufficiently fostered, as true to aspiration, for exploration and discovery regarding internal dimensions of consciousness. These have been excellently documented in precedent conference and teaching phases, properly relating to foundational understanding among branches of neuroscience and quantum physics. Harold Atmanspacher,  a neuroscientist from Jung's own Institute, and a multiplicity of other dedicated key branch-scientists, have made concerted progress in their own specific fields through contiguous dedication established in foundational research dialogues of consciousness studies--especially on the basis of SBInstitute peer-reviewed documentation most responsible in founding processes of positive and affective psychology--a contemplative neuroscience, and other branches to a science of consciousness relevant to clear potential benefits of intercollegiate and interdependent scholarship.
Among shamatha connected purviews are four genres: (1) experience, (2) epistemic reasoning that comprises a worldview and view, (3) imagination: salutary embodiment of creative praxis including Jungian archetypes of definitive internal-healing (of attenuation to imagination-deficit disorders), and (4) intuition. It should be posited that manifold ISP research outlines have fulfilled an authentic role by way of analytical presidents in comparative-research, that a century ago to significance began to formulate in European languages, definitively emerging in tandem with a quantum revolution of integral and evolving science principles (e.g. presented for popular readership by Penrose in the Emperor's New Mind, 1989). In addition, the ISP (with a byname of International 'Dynamic Equilibrium Project') and Wallace's interlocutions of 'DynEq study and practice',  have pertinently included interpersonal and psychophysical, developmental practice-representations that are a definitive synthesis contiguous of Jung's brilliant understanding of science archetypes. Such a cipher of definitive Indo-European Sanskrit constructs, as supportive sources, express basic and prototypical principles (with a generic name of Maha-Ati) encompassing a broadband synthesis of contemporary practice together with gradient intuitive realisations: phrased of pristine awareness and equanimity in wisdom. These are senses of assimilated relevance, regarding present and historical development after Gautama, as intercultural foundations of culture and wisdom: a world heritage of equilibrium-praxis without posing this as belief-system. The virtue of such research is attributed to a dedicated scholarly history coursing through Himalayan, Asian, and western regions of ancient to contemporary, phenomenological and interpersonal-praxis. Santa Barbara Institute for Consciousness Studies, has a key role as research base with respect to evolution of such wisdom, qualified by valid practices of conative, attentional, cognitive, and emotional intelligence (with appropriate placement among mutual foundations of branch culture and science). The foundations of research acumen comprise unique layers of scientific wisdom and knowledge, transcending idealistic projection on those empirical working-hypotheses. Historical development of both theory and practice as contemplative inquiry and comprehensive presidents of nurture, are therefore mutual embodiments of vision quest: a wellspring intricately relating to explicit research presidents. An expositional spectrum of teaching-practice has during half a century, correlated a synthesis of consciousness studies by way of empirical phenomenology, to pragmatically function as multi-disciplinary research.<Update: 2015-Dec 2016-MarJuneAug2017>
<WikiRecordsUpdate>When placing the details in this section on Wikipedia, it was made clear that some of these were formative notes for dialogue and development relating to cooperative biographical enquiry. Nominations were quite wordy on first formulation apart from being of general knowledge. By way of such consideration, one requested task was to establish the primary sources of relevance, and that commenced with a presentation on two parallel sources as basis for those manifold details and dialogs of interdisciplinary delineation.
Regarding the ISP research-lexicon, it is of clear purpose for both higher-order propositional and public sense-making research presentations, to not ignore the semantic-linguistic constraints apropos varied branches of discipline. The ISP President has been an uncommon debater from the beginning, and there are relative newcomers to science being awarded world famous prizes whose worldview and reasoning are manifold contradictions explicated in Wallace's philosophy of science with dialectics of pragmatic wisdom regarding elementary topics. Being a colleague among worlds of brilliant scientists, Wallace's intercollegiate accomplishments are an acuity of wisdom, from the beginning evidently configured by pragmatic motivation and dedication reflecting his valid exploration of discovered dimensions of consciousness. The answers to unqualified qualms, have long since been resolved through phases of public debate. In this, the fathomed quests by their gradients of elucidative explanation, have meritoriously been charted in transition along qualified symmetries of applied scrutiny. The abridged reliable protocols of simplicity, are moreover, unique exemplifiers of integrative scientific and cultural ethics.
Dr Wallace's qualified progress over the communal decades is no less than that of bona fide scientific aspiration and prodigy. Acknowledgement is therefore due in that empirical validity of meaningfully associated dialogue (it is not of a person-ality). Details of that mention, especially include the ontological theories of relativity ('S/Gtor': detailed in science chapter) among manifold accomplished contributions, transitioned through relevance-dialogue and consultation. As pertinent synopses of emergent world-view, syntheses of insight, and effective models of applied network-practice, are an internal consistency of special ontological-relativity theory. Considering the decades of most regular dialogue and exposition, these outline the graduation of qualms and ways forward from paradoxical dogmas and dualities, properly diagnosing the topical symptoms.
Notes1. A byname for: special and general theories of ontological relativity, as 'S/Gtor', was nominated in 2010 by SciCVN.org support initiatives. Textual sources are introduced in Hidden Dimensions :the Unification of Physics and Consciousness, pp. 50, 70. Columbia University Press, 2007.2. From an Atmanspacher talk on URL= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1KUxsrCviU A further gen. reference is at URL= http://quantum-mind.co.uk/harold-atmanspacher/3. Bynames for dynamic equilibrium, as 'Dyn.Eq', and the International Shamatha Project (ISP) as 'International Dynamic Equilibrium Project', were nominated in 2010 by SciCVN.org support initiatives.<Rev.2015/Dec2016/MarJuneAug2017>
(2) A Science of Consciousness
As synopsis to the above title, basics are of first-pragmatic working-science-hypotheses of establishment, fully compiled by Santa Barbara Institute for Consciousness Studies; also standards for empirical inquiry and correctives in relation to aspects of pseudo-bias. Founding contributions to a science of consciousness include modes of qualitative and quantitive empirical-development--with regard to mapped dimensions of consciousness--in conjunction with a broad interface of epistemic factors included as 1st, 2nd, and 3rd-person reciprocal means: a 3-dimensional science of psychophysical development with an integrated basis of firsthand practice; an interface to 2nd-person mentorship of DynEq study and practice; and epistemic principles credible of 3rd-person aspects included as factors in contemplative neuroscience.
The experimental interface of an initial Shamatha Project (est. 2007)--being a defining most comprehensive study-model to date regarding effects of meditation on mind and body--was a collaboration between among all others the UCDavis Centre for Mind and Brain and Dr Wallace's SBInstitute.  Development of the learned research mentorship and communal science knowhow, was established across half a century of concerted international nurture to deep understanding of a broadband manifold of shamatha practices. After the initial research project yielded founding science results through intricate experimentation, these were applied to an International Shamatha Project.  Integral factors of the project are of a synthesis of interdisciplinary and longitudinal research established by Dr Alan Wallace: a pre-eminent longitudinal mentor and founder of SBInstutute for consciousness studies. A lexicon of dedicated terminology in its mutual definitions among related interdisciplinary research, has emerged over the decades evolving as a interface of science-definition and traversed breakthroughs. The natural-language [NL] interface expresses a valid contemporary-lexicon, longitudinally pioneered and consensually guided by exacting standards of international scrutiny.
Of complement to virtues of scientific aspiration, are overviews written into Wallace's manifold publications such as a Contemplative Science : where buddhism and Science converge (Columbia University Press, 2007). A contemplative science of the mind is an evolved entry for a natural-philosophy of mind, a prior entry for science in much the same way that scientists used to be called natural philosophers. Manifold new disciplines have directly evolved out of such pragmatic nurture and paradigmatic shift, multiple others have been reinvigorated with an integral world-view of interdependent dimensional realities. MB Mensky’s functional presentations on the Middle Way (2005, 2010 in the Russian Academy of Sciences RAS Journal (founded, 1918): Physics-Uspekhi), were primary acknowledgements pertaining to the interface of consciousness studies as necessary and sufficient in mapping a specific and general/predicate and propositional interfaces of natural language as highly functional foundation postulates (NL): such a syntheses of both kinds of calculus (the two classic branches of logic in unified Baconian and Cartesian contexts) mapping pragmatic cross-disciplinary projects of cognitive science, was of full synopsis in 2016 by CogSci Professor Donald Hoffman, as preeminent research especially enhanced by a 2003 report: Pressing Scientific Issues For The Nation And For The World: establishing postulates in co-emergent experimental templates of insight, and applied feed-back loops to e.g. quantum theory and quantum cosmogony. The research dialogue on developmental-templates are contemporary projects of founding contemplative-science inquiry, on protocol and principle of ongoing guiding exploration: deepening insight into reliably established standards to serviceable roles. The ISP's collaborative research-history of interdisciplinary dialogue (since the 1970s), serves to elucidate topics that are interfaces of both secular and spiritual ethics, co-related concerns highlighting worthy protocols for ‘inter-faith’ reliability: cooperative factors that equally improve standards in relation to both spheres. Since the nineteenth century there has been gradual paradigmatic-lessoning of related mutual confusion (along parts of paradigmatic shift), in parallel to global features of intransigence and lacks of caring attentiveness for explicitly practical remedial-work.
Integrative meditative exploration of scientifically tested pathways relating to the psychophysiological flourishing of exceptional mental balance, is indeed credible in contrast to incredible, extraordinary but not incomprehensible. This is by way of evolved explicit-principles and protocols, essential for attenuation in the process of empirical-qualitative shifts of science via working-hypotheses. Optimal aspects of such network-practice, not least over the last half century, have reflected valid science orientations regarding purposes of 'consciousness studies'. Paradigmatic shifts of related import in depth-psychology, are parallel discoveries of complementarity contained in Jung's Red BookLiber Novus (withheld until 2009). Sono Shamdasani (Editor) and Stephen Hoeller’s commentaries have both conveyed the prodigious responsibility to elucidate definitive contemporary parts of delineated paradigmatic-shifts: emergent clarifications of Jung's practice dispelling misconceptions prior to and after the publication. These were profound significations pending, allaying a mainstream of psychological, scientific, and common illusions of knowledge with respect to the whole era and beyond of Jung and Freud. That depth psychology is definitive with respect to components of precedent mental-development (and conative integrations of mindful endeavour). It is then apt that the theory of complementarity well-defined by Jung and Pauli, also has significance to empirical contrasts of percipient understanding, and progressive paradigm-shifts from dream-like anomalies of confusion (further briefs documented in 'Psychology').<Dec 2016-Mar-Aug2017>
Introductory ‘S/Gtor’ Syntheses
From the beginning of the ISP science master's studies, pragmatic inquiry has qualified his interests, and parallel developmental modes of peace-building on that basis have been founded across secular, cultural, and spiritual factors of precedent consideration: as related contemporary-inquiry consistent in its experiential-practical reflections over each decade. On prior research foundations, a natural theory of human consciousness--having its roots in contemporary physics, Buddhism, and related studies--is posited as dedicated valid ground on which an ontological theory of relativity is of larger comprehension. Formulated overviews in its phenomenology are in accord with evolved mainstream science structures of experimentation par excellence. Ontology (nature of relational identity and being) in this sense is a qualitative and quantitive empirical system of experiential-definition: a referent of 'psychophysically transformative and evolving' consciousness as phenomenally existent entity. 'G/tor' ontological-relativity then basically relates to a deeper reality of transformational meditative wisdom-insight, of intricate, profound, and unassuming simplicity.  With an inner-science probity, this practically correlates prior understandings of relativity theory,  with a parallel model--as part of a contemplative science and praxis of consciousness studies--having independently evolved (in the example of findings from different laboratories): the two bear essential features of co-relative complementarity as recorded by many decades of the international practical-documentation.
Notes 1. For detailed information related to the Shamatha Project, visit URL= http://mindbrain.ucdavis.edu/labs/Saron/shamatha-project and URL= http://www.sbinstitute.com/shamathaproject 2. Dynamic equilibrium: being a contemporary term determined by Wallace as most intricately related to attainments of shamatha principle, and attributes of exceptional mental balance (SciCVN byname: ‘DynEq').<Rev.Sept-Oct2015/2016/JuneAug2017 Related to front-page material on website> 3. As synopsis in Hidden Dimensions, p. 70-84, Columbia, B. Alan Wallace, 2007. 4. Outlined in HD, p.71.
'S/tor' Working Hypotheses (Intro)
In the transformative working hypothesis of 'S/tor', the psyche (and psychophysical) is pragmatically viewed as an emergent property of substrate consciousness. That natural theory of human consciousness suggests that mental phenomena are conditioned by the brain, but do not emerge from it: this was also the explicit proposal by Pauli and Jung of unis mundis as contributive to the configuration of dialogues. Empirical confirmation-bias is avoided in principled development of varied shamatha modes of qualified praxis (inc. both conceptual and non-conceptual factors). Thereby, the 'sTOR’ synopsis of gradient psychophysical mental-development, is of basic vision-quests understood to be mutually adjustive in demystification, regarding secondarily anomalous and extraordinary phenomena by nature of empirical significance.
The Prana and Qi basic medical-systems (Jap. ki and Korean: gi: as life force termed by Wallace of bio-energy) are two ancient and modern health systems of complementarity, contributing unique general characteristics of scientific correlation essentially contributive to science of consciousness. By way of extensive research findings, biologists and physiologists (see 'Templates') have long-investigated the ontological relativity of basic yogicbio-energies associated with Prana and Qi. Wallace (with expert experience translated into both fields) has contributed postulation of credible empirical assertion that these are psychophysical and physical, not material: in addition to being a fundamental unification of bio-energy and consciousness directly viewed as single entity; defined as having both physical an immaterial attributes akin to Hilbert space and electromagnetism. In Jung's postulations, the psyche mainly refers to mental-configurations imputed on grosser attributes of the mind and body, and moreover, to a 'deeper psyche' in parallel to what Wallace phrases a substrate consciousness. It was both physicist Wolfgang Pauli and psychologist Jung who first collaboratively defined rudimentary perspectives of unified physics and consciousness studies: mind and matter, subjects and objects, that both arise from a deeper 'unitary domain of reality more fundamental than those dualities': unis mundis.  The 'S/tor' working hypothesis posits a psyche of grosser mental-configuration conditioned by brain and other physical energy-centres, and a deeper mental-developmental connection as remarkably distinct in meditators, where what Jung phrases as a 'deeper-psyche' is unconditioned by external or internal gross stimulus, or body/brain.
<Wiki>Empirical Statements In the same perspective as a theory expressing the conservation of energy, when course mind is not active it does not just dissolve into a nothingness, or into a composite of different nature to itself--but it can be understood as dissolving into a substrate of consciousness: a distinct underlying subtle-continuum. No research has inferred characteristics of consciousness actually emerging from neurones and electrons; there are no actual tests for choosing or validating among various classes of physicalist assertion: that mind is either function of, an emergent property of, or of equivalence to brain activity; thus not being testable scientific theories they remain as conjecture: if reified they become a metaphysical assumption. The textbook: Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century, written by a whole team at Virginia University, ‘presents empirical evidence that reductive materialism is not only incomplete but false.’ The neural correlates of consciousness (NCC: minimal activity needed to generate consciousness), so-called, are themselves components of thorough inquiry, and the above label has proven a literal anathema in terms of meaningfulness: e.g. a multitude of cases have been investigated where brain functions have ceased yet continuity of experience is even more vividly emergent. Post-Dead Experiences: where brain functions have ceased yet continuity of experience is more vividly emergent. Mainstream science of Sam Parnia and Pim van Lomal has produced extensive evidence on this, rephrasing near-death experiences as post-dead: where brain activity ceases for lengthy periods of time, brains and bodies able to be fully revived. contemplative scholarly wisdom explicates this as an ongoing subtlest continuum of consciousness, an underlying factor of withdrawing attachment from self-identification: thereby bearing direct insight into a substrate-consciousness. This is well phrased by scholarship as not identifying with anything that will die.  Knowing conclusion follows that there is no continuum that can die apart from the 'mind-psyche'. These factors are additionally comprehended in unique ways via the science lucid dreaming and dream-yoga; a practice being without construal of a duality of subject and object aspects.
Rupert Sheldrake (Royal Society) is a sane interdisciplinary scientist with unique practical understanding of spirituality at the interface of paranormal normative phenomena. He reiterates that there are over 1000 papers in peer reviewed journals showing the reality of out of body experience; having himself published over 80 peer-reviewed papers in journals (inc. Nature) and ten successful books. Q. How would these be related to Wallace's work? As rephrased in other parts, Psi, including reliably inferred extra-sensory phenomena, is effectively an ancillary domain of highly contextual enquiry by perspectives of how Shamatha principles are established. Wallace has conducts very primary investigations into Psi, and his uses are contrastive perspectives to those of Sheldrake, with the same purview of working with yogis who are lineage masters and being of sufficient first-person practice. Buddhist technical investigations of that pragmatic understanding are most reliable as configured 3D empirical constraints in nurture of the mind. Sheldrake's extraordinary research experiments include video observation of pets visibly pining for their owners at exact times when they are physically a long way away, and are about to start off in returning home. Some general conclusions have thereby been wholly established concerning telepathy. Morphic fields and morphic resonance, are his defined structures of causation, and relative to complex experimentation on self-organising systems and quantum entanglement. 
International forums of ongoing DynEq related conference itinerary are contiguous with prime determinations of that foundational mind-science (of pragmatic nature and function), as part of a valid developmental world-view of potential appropriate to human mental and psychological evolvement (flourishing): directly qualitative in relation to contemporary standards on meditative-attainment simply relevant to interpersonal praxis in its dedicated psychology.
An 's/TOR' special ontological working hypothesis, expounded in Hidden Dimensions, 2007, is qualified by unified shamatha and vipashyana principles, and Wallace's definitions such as: '…refining one's attention and metacognition, to create a kind of telescope to examine the space of mind'. The general theory is also no less well-researched in: 'Drawing on the work of Sir John Wheeler, he then proposes a more general theory…' 
As previously phrased, the general theory of innate discovery is further correlated to acknowledged conceptual and non-conceptual discoveries of the 'material-substrate' (and connected to basic relativity theory), and to the nature of mind, configured for a SciOfConsc as finely correlated to profound approximations of branch-science, and meditative non-conceptual discoveries in relation to substrate consciousness and a further dimension phrased as a forth time.
The way in which the nature of a substrate space of mind and its contents is described and investigated via working-hypotheses, also has direct complementarity with distinguished field theories in quantum physics as specifically understood in Sir John Wheeler's theories. The phrasing of Complementarity is an operator in that lexicon of discovery, by way of perspectives in psychology, philosophy, physiology, biology and quantum physics; denoting meaningful spaces of experience at the interface between mental states and the psychophysical world. Neuroscientist Harold Atmanspacher (of the CG Jung Institute), has extensively published with mainstream acknowledgement on these expressions and contexts. He has also participated in communal dialogues of procedural integrity with Dr Wallace, toward developing on founding formulations for a core science of consciousness. He abridges that ontologically validated features of consciousness studies are consistent and meaningful 'instantiations of mind-body inquiry', according to investigations regarding correlated dimensions of extraordinary and profound experience. As an outline of 'G/tor', the pragmatic theory of 'phenomenal-interdependency' is what is of complementarity to Einstein's theory of relativity, as profound cosmogony of ordinary science, quantum-theory, cosmogony, and meditative realisation.
The following statement is from back-cover of Wallace's Contemplative science : where Buddhism and Neuroscience Converge (Columbia Univ. Press, 2007): ‘A copy should go to every scientist--both physical and contemplative--in the land. --The Scientific and Medical Network'. The labour has been one among forty such published works, and it is true by all his interfaces to dialog that a common DynEq health-system has been expounded with simplicity of forthcoming experimental understanding. The emergent contemporary synthesis comprises well founded elucidation to peacekeeping peace-building, in larger and smaller harmonies of humanity, and explicate reality of possibility mediational in connection to what are, have been, and can be pristine faculties of science and culture; moreover, an elucidation of such means of vision quest in communal contemplative-life. These are explicate foundational developments and discoveries in terms of applicability of cultivating introspective-mindfulness free of the dualities. Contemporary scientific discoveries with regard to proper experimentation on the basis of the four empathetic/aspirational factors of conducive cultivation (congruent in deep experience of both Theravadin and Mahayana Buddhist wisdom), basically equate to basicly cultivated conative, attentional, cognitve, emotional intelligence and psychophysical balance; and in these unifying ways, the human flourishing of DynEq is such a possibility of reality.